Home Up Contents

Home
Up
Troubleshooting
News
Links pages
Training Materials
Newsletters
Order Form
Bug of the Month
Beneficial Reuse
Biosolids
Case Histories
De nos jours
Products
Feedback
Search
Staff
Training Classes
Services
Microscopic

Bioengineering

Bioaugmentation

Bacterial Products

Produits Biologiques

Beneficial Reuse

Table of Contents

New Training CD's

 

 

 

 

New Training Manuals

 

 

 

 

Benchmarks

Industry

FYI

Consulting

Training

Additional links

Miscellaneous

Audits

Troubleshooting Tips

Microscopic Analyses

Case Histories

Additional Troubleshooting Topics

Duckweed

Algae

Lift Stations

Wastewater Microbiology

Microscopic Analyses

Photomicrographs

Filamentous Identification

Biological Products

 

 

 

 

 

Wastewater Treatment Seminar

Sign up now for our Monthly Newsletter

Request for our new Brochures

Call now to set up a Wastewater Biomass Analyses or Filamentous Identification of your plant!

Finally new Release

Filamentous Identification

"the Easy Way"

New training program

 

How do I evaluate Biological products?

It is very confusing, one person says his biological product has 1 billion count in the final product, Another vendor says his biological product is better because it has 5 x 109 cfu, still a third says his product has "3+ billion per gram viable cell count". What is the difference and what do those terms mean?

It is confusing, how do they all compare?

Well one thing to note- cfu stands for colony forming units. It is a measure of plate counting bacteria to get official numeration of the amount of bacteria present per gram of product.

Make sure the CFU or plate counts are per gram vs. per gallon, per lb, etc. What you are measuring has to correlate to how you obtained the sample, how much sample is used and how the results were achieved. Sound complicated, well it can be. Sometimes vendors use plate counts as a "magic number" to wave around and try to out maneuver their competitors.

Numbers are not always as important as the types of bacteria present. We have done years of studies that prove that the number of bacteria present is not as critical as the types of bacteria present. We have found in most wastewater treatment facilities, that it is the Gram Negative bacteria that are better floc formers. Bacillus and Gram positive bacteria do not form as solid of a floc structure.

Both types of bacteria will degrade BOD similarly. But in most treatment plants, BOD as well as TSS is important, therefore, floc structure is very important.

One thing we did when testing and developing biological products was to perform shake flask tests. Shake flask studies are conducted for treatability studies of wastewater samples to reduce overall BOD or to target a specific compound and to improve settling characteristics. It can be used for toxicity studies or for product screening procedures. It is similar to a quick and dirty jar testing for polymers that most people are familiar with but takes a little bit more time and is used to evaluate the performance of biological products.

These studies use various strains of bacteria and different supplier's products to test counts vs. types of bacteria present. BOD removal, floc formation, higher life forms present, and TSS were all measurements that were taken into consideration. If plate counts are performed, the number of bacteria, the size and shape of the colonies on the plate as well as the diversity must be taken into consideration. Slime formation on the plates should be evaluated also.

*Note- Sometimes if companies are aware that a biological product is going to be used for comparison studies between other companies and competitive biological products, they have been known to "spike " the test sample to a higher concentration of bacteria in order for their product to deliver higher results. Be careful what you tell the supplier or make sure that what sample they deliver meets those same specs continually. Hold them to the plate counts on their biological product if they maintain that this is their normal product quality.

Here is a photo of two sets of plates. One biological product is mostly bacillus or gram positive bacteria. The set on the right is a mixture with a high blend of Gram negative bacteria and mostly pseuds. The plate on the right, regardless of the initial counts, showed higher growth potential and activity, more natural polysaccharides, which help to form floc and reduce TSS and polymer consumption in final clarifiers.

Here is a two-week trial of our biological product vs. a competitor product. Our biological products typically  have only a count of 1 billion per gram, but it is mostly gram negative bacteria. Here is a competitor product used at an outside lab in a treatability study. Formula A has a count of 5 billion per gram. This study was run for three weeks.

 

What you can see from the trial is that even though two sets of flasks were run of each biolgoical product, a 1% solution and a 3 % solution, Formula A had significantly higher counts in the original product, but it could never reach the level of activity that our MicroClear formulation achieved instantly. MicroClear was also able to stay at the higher level of activity throughout the experiment. Formula a peaked at day 3, dropped off at day 7 and stayed at a significantly lower level throughout the entire experiment than the MicroClear product.

Also note, that 3% of Formula A could not reach the level of only 1% of MicroClear in spite of the higher initial counts and in spite of the 3 times the dosage in the 3% vs. 1% flask.

This proves that counts on biological products are meaningless.  Growth and activity due to types of strains present in the biological product are really what you should be interested in!!!

Treatability Study Comments:

The treatability of the wastewater samples is determined on the basis of

bulletRelative increase in bacterial counts (Tfinal / Tinitial)
bulletDecrease in TOC over the 24-hr period.
bulletMicroscopic Examination including:
bulletNumber and morphology of floc structures, color,
bulletSettleability, size and shape of floc
bulletPolysaccharide coating
bulletQuantification of higher life forms- types as well as numbers
bulletClarity of the bulk water

Ok, well that was a lab test, sometimes field tests may prove to be different. do you still doubt that bacterial counts are not as important as types? Think of it this way, if you were to chose a basketball team and had 10 guys off the street vs. 5 Michael Jordans- who do you think would give you better results? You do not chose a polymer program based upon actives or molecular count, but on performance, why should you choose your bacterial products based upon numbers?

Still not convinced? Here is an actual papermill that was using Formula A. They were using 3-5 lbs of Formula A per day. We switched them to a program with 1 lb of our MicroSolv 118 and one lb of MicroClear M100- a micronutrient formulation. Lower dosages, yet better results, you can't beat that!

Products for use in Wastewater Applications for Bioengineering and Bioaugmentation

Biological Products, Descriptions,  Usage and Applications

Papermills: Case History with Total System Optimization:

100% Recycle papermill with once through lagoon

The first stage of the lagoon was aerated, second and third settling lagoons. Large amounts of algae, scum and duckweed covered the last two stages of the pond. This pond was on a bioaugmentation program for years.

 

An audit was conducted, recommendations to move one of the aerators to the first half of the second stage were made to allow more oxygen to carry through the rest of the system. Bioaugmentation was changed from 2-5 lbs of product per day from local supplier to 1-2 lbs of MicroSolv 118 and 1 lb of Micronutrients M100.

In less than 2 weeks, the scum was gone off the pond, the BOD and TSS removal improved, floc structures increased significantly and higher life activity went sky high. Short, free-floating filaments disappeared. Spirillum (usually an indication of septic conditions) and zooglea were gone after changes in treatment. Some filaments are still in the floc structures, mostly Type 021N, but that is due to solids handling problems in the primary clarifier that are under consideration for optimization.

Prior to Bioaugmentation program changes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Smaller floc with lots of filaments                                            Zooglea and spirrilum

Photo taken at 100x bright field                                            Photo taken at 400x bright field

After addition of MicroSolv 118 and Micronutrients                        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Large compact floc structures                                    Significant increase in higher life forms, rotifers, less fillaments and TSS
Both of these photos taken at 100x bright field

The primary clarifier still needs a bit of solids handling optimization, but the plant is waiting on an additional tank up front to store settled solids that are recycled back into the system.

The plant at one point had an upset for a two-week period; twice the loading of BOD was entering the lagoons. The final BOD was still below previous year's final effluent values and way below permit levels!

Products for use in Wastewater Applications for Bioengineering and Bioaugmentation

Here is the current update on our Papermill!

We were asked over a year ago to come in and troubleshoot for a papermill with a once through lagoon. We made some process recommendation, gave some training and revised their current bioaugmentation program. The final effluent had the best BOD in the history of the plant. But, since the plant was on a "sole source " agreement with a major supplier of all their chemicals, they were forced to go back to their original supplier for biological products.  Well, after just 6 months, the plants is back on our products and program. The results could not even come close on their program!

While we believe some of our products are specially formulated and are very good, the major thing we believe is important is the training, consulting, analyses and support that we have to offer.  But the real proof is in the final BOD number! Check to see how we compare. . . .

BOD final permit limits are 25 and TSS numbers are 30 ppm. We consistently hit close to 5 ppm BOD once the program was up and running! Very good for a papermill! Even the cold weather months with a normal slowdown in activity, the BOD was still on the mark!

TSS is more a function of the primaries and they just installed a number of new thickeners, a new sludge recycle pump during various points in this trial, so TSS was not really an issue between both companies unless you were to say the influent loading was higher, but BOD was the real driving issue!

More data on this case history!

Call today to find out more information on how to start your own Bioaugmentation program!

Biological Products for use in Wastewater Applications for Bioengineering and Bioaugmentation

Additional Comments:

If using this for a guideline to compare biological programs and vendors, please take into consideration Total Program value, cost per equivalent product in ratio, evaluations of shake flask testing, BOD/TOC as well as TSS comparisons. Health of the biomass after addition of product, Technical support, training, program consulting, experience and additional corporate back-up are also considerations that need to be accounted for. Many times the EPA can be involved with plants, new permit evaluations, etc. make sure your vendor is capable of providing you these services and recommendations if needed.

 

Call today to find out more about a Biological Wastewater System Optimization Program for your plant. . . .1-630-906-9791

Biological Wastewater Treatment Products

Biological Product Information

Bioaugmentation

Products for use in Wastewater Applications for Bioengineering and Bioaugmentation

Select the items that apply, and then let us know how to contact you.

Send product literature
Send company literature
Have a salesperson contact me

Send Additional Case History Information

I would like to order the Wastewater Training CD's -Please send me more information

Send information on how to get a Microscopic analyses

I would like to send in a sample for a Wastewater Biomass Analyses

I would like to have photos taken of my own wastewater treatment system for training purposes

I would like Hands-on training at my wastewater plant on Microscopic analyses

I would like to send in a sample for a Filamentous Identification

I would like to have digital videos taken of my own wastewater treatment system for training purposes

Please send more information on your Bioaugmentation Products and Solutions

Name

Title

Company

Address

E-mail

Phone

Copyright ©2003 Environmental Leverage Inc. All rights reserved.
Revised: June 06, 2006.

[Under Construction] This page under construction